A sacred responsibility shirked.
A commitment to fairness and objectivity toward the goal of creating an informed electorate is a small price to pay for the privilege and standing that the legacy media continue to enjoy.
A commitment to fairness and objectivity toward the goal of creating an informed electorate is a small price to pay for the privilege and standing that the legacy media continue to enjoy.
No nation that wishes to call itself sovereign can live with what is going on now.
No nation that wants to call itself sovereign can permit millions of people to come in unvetted with no thought given as to the impact.
Dick Cheney’s fealty to the customs and niceties of establishment Washington now exceeds any fealty to conservative governance he might have once had.
There is confusion as to what is on the ballot on November 5. Note that I said, “what,” and not, “who.”
In the absence of the vetting that a properly functioning fourth estate is supposed to provide, the only thing standing between Kamala Harris and the Oval Office is Donald Trump.
The choice isn’t between a more likable Kamala Harris or a less likable Donald Trump. It’s not about either of them.
It’s about a choice between two governing visions that are more divergent than at any time in my adult life.
There are questions that a properly curious media (assuming that such a thing exists) might want to ask Kamala Harris.
Character matters. But with respect to the presidency, policy matters more.
It can be fairly said that Democrats have a race fixation. Maybe call it a fetish.
Kamala Harris is a radical California progressive. But don’t take my word for it. Take hers.
Federal hiring continues to outpace the private sector even as federal office spaces sit largely empty most of the time.