Groping for freedom.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Click here to listen to the broadcast of You Tell Me on KTBB AM & FM, Friday, Nov. 19, 2010.

The holiday season is upon us and that conjures memories of the recent past and a less than pleasant look at the dysfunctional present as it pertains to airline travel.

You might recall that last Christmas, a then 23-year old Nigerian national by the name of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried without success to detonate a bomb that was sewn into his pants while approaching Detroit, Michigan aboard a Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam. The bomb did not detonate and Abdulmutallab was subdued and restrained by passengers and crew members.

On the day after the incident, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in a statement regarding the role of U.S. aviation security that the system had “worked.” She later was forced to backtrack on this assertion as the multiple breakdowns in the system her department oversees started coming to light.

In fact, the system most assuredly did not work. It didn’t even come close. Abdulmutallab was practically wearing a sign saying, “I’m a radicalized Muslim bent on committing mass murder against Americans” as he boarded the plane. On November 19, Abdulmutallab’s father made a report to CIA officers in Nigeria expressing concern about his son’s “extreme religious views.”

Intelligence officials in the UK reported to U.S. intelligence services that Abdulmutallab had ties to Anwar al Awlaki, previously a U.S. imam with ties to three of the 9/11 hijackers, the London subway bombings and the shooter at Ft. Hood.

As if this were not enough, U.S. intelligence officials were aware of Internet postings by Abdulmutallab saying things such as, “dying by jihad is one of the surest paths to paradise.”

Still, a bumbling Homeland Security and U.S. intelligence bureaucracy could not manage to get Abdulmutallab’s name on the “no fly” list (the same list upon which U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy’s name appeared multiple times).

It was Abdulmutallab’s incompetence at detonating the bomb that he was wearing, and his incompetence alone, that averted a tragedy aboard a U.S. airliner on Christmas Day 2009.

So let’s review. In Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s world, your own father ratting you out wont’ keep you off a U.S. bound airliner. Information tying you to a known and wanted terrorist won’t do the trick either. In Janet Napolitano’s world, a 23-year old Nigerian Muslim with terrorist ties and internet musings about jihad can still fly.

But not you.

For you to fly, you must suffer a full body x-ray that reveals an image of your naked body. Or if you don’t like that, you may “opt out” and instead be subjected to a “pat down”, consisting of a TSA employee touching your breasts if you’re a woman and your genitalia no matter who you are.

Janet Napolitano can’t act on clear intelligence about a young, angry foreign national bent on jihad either out of monumental incompetence or for fear of offending the sensibilities of Muslims. But if you and your wife and your children want to fly to grandma’s for the holidays, she gets to reach down the front of your pants.

If you fly this holiday season and are subjected to the latest pointless indignities and assaults on your freedom, you must remember one thing. It’s your government and thus your responsibility.

When it becomes destructive to your liberty and to your safety, only you can hold it accountable.

If the Homeland Security secretary gropes your wife, you’re the one letting it happen.

Paul Gleiser

Paul L. Gleiser is president of Gleiser Communications, LLC, licensee of radio stations KTBB 97.5 FM/AM600, 92.1 The Team FM & KYZS in Tyler-Longview, Texas.

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Ariel Brumley says:

    If the Homeland Security secretary gropes your wife (or your children), you’re the one letting it happen.

  2. Linda E. Montrose says:

    Can someone explain to me HOW this will work if muslim women are exempt from the scans and gropes? If this is a requirement for US citizens, it should be a requirement for EVERYONE…NO EXEMPTIONS. It seems to me there is more to this than just “safety” issues. This invasion of our privacy is NOT acceptible in anyway shape or form or for any reason. There are other ways to maintain safety with out such invasion of our privacy! No one should have to put up with this!

  3. Bennh Haunna says:

    So instead of one of the two search options, do you have an alternative that will keep the skies safe?………………….. didn’t think so. For as much support as tea bag party people gave to the Patriot Act I am surprised you’d oppose the searches or scans.

  4. amber says:

    I am 13 years old and on my way to Ialy, and I am NOT looking forward to being “patted down” or “x-rayed”.

  5. Lacy Jones says:

    My husband and I traveled with KTBB radio to Rome, Italy – a fantastic trip!! BUT because I have had knee replacement surgery, I set off the metal detectors – thus requiring a complete pat-down. I did object verbally to the woman patting my breast and touching my private parts. She called over her supervisor who gave me 2 alternatives – find another way home or be patted down. There is no wand or full body x-ray available at the Atlanta airport or Dallas DFW airports. It was humiliating and degrading – all in the name of security!

  6. Russell Greenlee says:

    This same stuff was going on during the Bush presidency. But people weren’t throwing hissyfits on TV. Paul, did you have an editorial about the patriot act WHEN IT HAPPENED?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *