NASA on the wane.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Dismantled launch complex 39B, once used for Apollo & shuttle launches.

Dismantled launch complex 39B, once used for Apollo and shuttle launches.

Listen To You Tell Me Texas Friday 11/14/14

Download

My daughter texted me Wednesday and exulted, “We landed a spaceship on a comet. Space is so cool.” I texted back, “But it wasn’t us. It was the Europeans.” She said, “Oh, it was the Europeans? That’s poopy.”

I completely agree (choice of adjective notwithstanding). It’s one more sad commentary on America’s declining stature.

At one time in the not-too-distant past, most of the significant accomplishments in space sported a NASA logo. Coming from behind to eclipse the Russians in the race to put men on the moon, NASA’s Apollo lunar landing program saved the otherwise miserable 1960s. But for ‘one small step’, the 1960s in America would be remembered only for race riots, anti-war protests and assassinations.

Traceable directly to Apollo, America assumed world leadership in technology. From computers in every office cubicle to smart phones in every purse and pocket to 3-D medical imaging to the ability to snap a photo of your kids and send it instantly to the grandparents – America has led the way in large measure as a result of the dividends paid by its space program.

The Apollo lunar landings were followed by many triumphs. Pioneer 10 launched in 1972 and sent back the first high-resolution images of Jupiter. Two Voyager missions left Earth in 1977 and took advantage of favorable planetary alignment so as to provide stunning images and data on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and their hitherto completely mysterious moons.

Beginning in 1975, NASA began landing unmanned probes on Mars, including four roving vehicles that have greatly exceeded their original goals.

1990 saw the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope. 1993 saw the Space Shuttle mission to correct a flaw in Hubble’s optical system. Hubble has looked deeper into space, and thus farther back in time, than ever before imaginable – resulting in a greater understanding of the universe.

Speaking of the Space Shuttle, it was, until its termination by the Obama administration in 2011, the world’s only reusable spacecraft. When the last shuttle mission ended in July 2011, so did America’s ability to put humans in space.

In 2010, President Obama promised that America would have a leadership role in space. Since then, he has effectively gutted NASA. He cancelled the Constellation program that would have returned Americans to the moon, slashed NASA’s interplanetary exploration program and cut unmanned probes to Mars in 2016 and 2018.

Resistance from Congress has been the only thing saving NASA from budgetary evisceration.

None of this is lost on the Chinese, who are now working on their own manned lunar program as their children – not coincidentally – outperform ours in science, technology, engineering and math.

John Kennedy saw the danger in letting the Soviets eclipse America in space. He understood that for a nation to be great, it must be a leader in scientific exploration. Barack Obama has no such clarity.

Four of the 12 Americans who walked on the moon are now dead. The remaining eight are old men. At the current rate, America’s leadership in space will pass away even before they do.

We will regret the passing.

Paul Gleiser

Paul L. Gleiser is president of Gleiser Communications, LLC, licensee of radio stations KTBB 97.5 FM/AM600, 92.1 The Team FM & KYZS in Tyler-Longview, Texas.

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Way back in college (1960s) I told a liberal friend (now pretty much a Communist) that if the current trend continued, the day would come when America’s space program and similar efforts would be abandoned due to the growth of the welfare state. And so it comes to pass. Soon it will be RIP NASA and in time RIP USA if we don’t change direction.

  2. pk says:

    I have always thought the Space Program held a vast( & fairly hidden ) cost for a low return for its continued support. I know some things were created through this project but considering the cost these were too small & with longer & longer distances the cost would be prohibitive someday.

    I have close relatives whose proudest achievement has been their participation therein.

    Nevertheless, Obama’s summary swift dismantling of NASA & turning its mission to a furthering of Muslim interests was never spoken to as to why this happened.
    I personally know that 23,000 aeronautical engineers were ( & still are ) laid off of this program several years ago.
    To what purpose??

    Yet it just goes along with my view of Obama’s bull rampaging through our Country using Alynski’s “Rules of Radicals” book principles.
    Obama is simply implementing the Community Activist ideas of destruction & befuddling & using bundles of problems not advancement of a society.
    But why not??
    \It’s the ONLY thing he apparently knows.

    I have worked a great amount of time as a Psychotherapist of Prisons & rehabilitation institutions
    .
    They tell you there that they make few rules because the inmates don’t use the rules for correct conduct; they use the rules to tell them what to challenge.
    Obama obviously uses this parameter for his own ideas.
    He doesn’t try to make things better, he attacks & tries to destroy things that work.
    Like the Constitution on top of NASA!

  3. Cliff says:

    So just because we (America) did not do it, it was BAD? That is such a idiotic position to take. Knowledge is good no matter how it is obtained. Also if you do any research on the expedition, you will discover that NASA had quite a lot of equipment on the lander. We American (and the rest of the world) will all benefit from the data gathered. Your editorial on FOX news was analogous to a spoiled brat whining that some other kid at the park got a ice cream cone and you didn’t

  4. Linda E. Montrose says:

    It is sad that America has declined in stature among the world scene at an alarming rate in the past few years. This is a by product of lberalism and it can be traced as far back in time if one is willing to go back and face the truth. No one has prospered and grown from it for as far back as we want to go in recorded time, so why does liberalism seem so popular? Liberalism stifles, it does not promote growth no matter how appealing liberals try to make it. NASA is a very good example of this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *